For immediate assistance text: 416-525-1510 | CONTACT US
Fraud

Workplace Fraud TIME THEFT

DISCIPLINING TIME THEFT

Can an employer treat time theft as seriously as theft of property when considering discipline?

 

“Time theft” occurs when an employee receives compensation for hours that they have not actually worked. In this context, time theft has been treated by decision-makers as meriting discipline for the same reasons as property theft. The core element of the employment relationship is a mutual bond of trust between the employee and the employee as well as subcontracted relationships. Decision-makers have characterized time theft, like property theft, as directly damaging that core element. Accordingly, time theft and property theft constitute an equally serious culpable act.

Although time theft is a culpable act, the level of discipline that is merited is context specific and is subject to standard mitigation factors, which include length of service, past disciplinary history, relevant employer policies and whether the employee showed remorse when caught. Decision-makers have upheld termination for time fraud in circumstances where the only mitigating factor is length of service.

Decision-makers have strictly defined what constitutes time theft. In order for a culpable action to be accurately characterized as time theft, that action must include an overtly fraudulent act. Examples of overly fraudulent acts that constitute time fraud include the alteration of time cards, employees punching in for each other or failing to record or falsely recording attendance on an attendance management system. If an intentionally fraudulent act is lacking, the culpable action may not be characterized by a decision-maker as constituting time theft. For example, decision-makers have held that, although excessive internet use for personal reasons is culpable behaviour, that usage lacks the intentionally fraudulent element and, as a result, does not constitute time fraud.

As outlined above, much of the analysis regarding time fraud is context specific. Accordingly, employers that are considering discipline for an incident of time theft are encouraged to seek advice from legal counsel.

Assess Your Risk

Are you protected? You Need Fred.

Don’t wait for fraud to find you. Be proactive and prevent it from happening in the first place.

Our FRAUD RISK & ETHICS DIAGNOSTIC is a questionnaire-based study tailored to your organization, aimed at discovering vulnerabilities, allowing you to put strategic preventative measures in place.

Testimonials

Dave is not only the leader in his field in South Africa but has a deserved international reputation with clients and law enforcement agencies worldwide. Dealing with excellence and integrity, I have no hesitation in recommending Dave for any task, both pro-active and reactive.

GILES HARTMAN

Simon is a complete package in himself with punctuality ingrained in his character. He is an amazing presenter with the capability of explaining forensic concepts with ease and with attention-grabbing examples that would imprint the concept(s) in anyone's mind. He is open to new ideas and more importantly, pushes people to learn/train themselves for their growth and benefit.

ROBIN SINGH

Dave has an impressive combination of forensic technology expertise, investigative skills, experience and business knowledge. He is a very persistent, client-focused investigator who quickly grasps what drives a particular business and the significance of those drives to client engagement.

MIKE DEAN

Dave and I recently worked together on a complex project related to two holdback calculations. His understanding of the transaction and drive to get to the supporting facts were excellent - and successful. I'd certainly work with Dave again!

Dodd Haynes
CFO

Forensic Restitution | ACFI
Forensic Restitution | CPA Ontario
Forensic Restitution | ACCA